Publications

Peperkamp, S. (2004). Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language, 80(1), 98-126. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0035

Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress "deafness" in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114(2), 266-275. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.001

Tieu, L., Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2019). Linguistic inferences without words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 116(20), 9796-9801. doi:10.1073/pnas.1821018116

Brusini, P., Brun, M., Brunet, I. & Christophe, A. (2015). Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1841. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841

Lev-Ari, S. & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals' native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 320-331. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.002

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Dunbar, E. (2019). Manipulated decision tasks to decode behavioral measures: the case of mouse-tracking. Behavior Research Methods, TBA

Martin, A., Van Heugten, M., Kager, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2022). Marginal contrast in loanword phonology: Production and perception. Laboratory Phonology, 13(1). doi:10.16995/labphon.6454

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2014). Monkey semantics: two ‘dialects’ of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls. Linguistics and Philosophy, 37(6), 439-501. doi:10.1007/s10988-014-9155-7

Charnavel , I. & Chemla, E. (2017). More Hybrid Agreement: simultaneous agreement with two competing triggers. Snippets, 31, 7-8. doi:10.7358/snip-2017-031-char

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Dunbar, E. (2019). Mouse tracking as a window into decision making. Behavior Research Methods, 1-17. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-01194-x

Mampe, B., Friederici, A., Christophe, A. & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current biology : CB, 19(23), 1994-7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064

Hesketh, S., Christophe, A. & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Non-nutritive sucking and sentence processing. Infant Behavior & Development, 20(2), 263-269. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90028-X

Farabolini, G. , Rinaldi, P. , Caselli, M. & Cristia, A. (2021). Non-word repetition in bilingual children: the role of language exposure, vocabulary scores and environmental factors. . Speech, Language and Hearing, 1(16). doi:10.1080/2050571X.2021.1879609

Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I. & Nakamura, K. (2008). On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology, 25(1), 129-164. doi:10.1017/s0952675708001425

Melnik, G. , Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2023). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French /u/–/y/ contrast. Second Language Research, ., 1–25. doi:.o0r.g1/107.171/0772/6072675685382302909888061

Melnik, G. , Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2021). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French /u/–/y/ contrast. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/0267658320988061

Tieu, L., Yatsushiro , K., Cremers, A., Romoli , J., Sauerland , U. & Chemla, E. (2017). On the Role of Alternatives in the Acquisition of Simple and Complex Disjunctions in French and Japanese. Journal of Semantics, 34, 127-152. doi:10.1093/jos/ffw010

Dezecache, G., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Bazin, C. & Maille, A. (2019). Orangutans’ Comprehension of Zoo Keepers’ Communicative Signals. Animals , 9(6), 300. doi:10.3390/ani9060300

Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I. & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetic, 38(3), 422-430. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001

Christophe, A., Mehler, J. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). Perception of prosodic boundary correlates by newborn infants. Infancy, 2(3), 385-394. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0203_6

Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Mehler, J. (1998 ). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 844-851

Melnik, G. & Peperkamp, S. (2019). Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145, EL13-EL18. doi:10.1121/1.5085648

Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress 'deafness': the case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682-706. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001

Marty, P., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2015). Phantom readings: the case of modified numerals. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 462-477. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.931592

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pena, M., Christophe, A. & Landrieu, P. (2004). Phoneme perception in a neonate with a left sylvian infarct. Brain and Language, 88(1), 26-38. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00284-0

Martin, A. & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37, 65-90. doi:10.1017/S0952675720000044

Peperkamp, S. (2003). Phonological acquisition: recent attainments and new challenges. Language and speech, 46(Pt 2-3), 87-113. doi:10.1177/00238309030460020401

Christophe, A., Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E. & Mehler, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 523-547. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.001

Gout, A., Christophe, A. & Morgan, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 548-567. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.002

Millotte, S., René, A., Wales, R. & Christophe, A. (2008). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 34(4), 874-85. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.874