Publications

Christophe, A., Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E. & Mehler, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 523-547. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.001

Tincoff, R., Hauser, M., Tsao, F., Spaepen, G., Ramus, F. & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of speech rhythm in language discrimination: further tests with a non-human primate. Developmental science, 8(1), 26-35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00390.x

Szenkovits, G. & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics' phonological deficit I: lexical vs sub-lexical and input vs output processes. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 11(4), 253-68.

Ramus, F. (2005). Motion perception deficit: Risk factor or non-specific marker for neurodevelopmental disorders? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 23, 180-188

White, S., Frith, U., Milne, E., Rosen, S., Swettenham, J. & Ramus, F. (2006). A double dissociation between sensorimotor impairments and reading disability: A comparison of autistic and dyslexic children. Cognitive neuropsychology, 23(5), 748-61. doi:10.1080/02643290500438607

White, S., Milne, E., Rosen, S., Hansen, P., Swettenham, J., Frith, U. & Ramus, F. (2006). The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: a multiple case study of dyslexic children. Developmental science, 9(3), 237-55; discussion 265-9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00483.x

White, S., Milne, E., Rosen, S., Hansen, P., Swettenham, J., Frith, U. & Ramus, F. (2006). Target article with commentaries and response: The role of sensorimotor impairments in dyslexia: A multiple case study of dyslexic children. Developmental Science, 9(3), 237-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00483.x

Vendelin, I. & Peperkamp, S. (2006). The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua, 116(7), 996-1007. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.005

Ramus, F. (2006). Genes, brain, and cognition: a roadmap for the cognitive scientist. Cognition, 101(2), 247-69. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.003

Ramus, F., White, S. & Frith, U. (2006). Response: Weighing the evidence between competing theories of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 9(3), 265-269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00488.x

Peperkamp, S., Le Calvez, R., Nadal, J. & Dupoux, E. (2006). The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition, 101(3), B31-B41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.006

Milne, E., White, S., Campbell, R., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P. & Ramus, F. (2006). Motion and form coherence detection in autistic spectrum disorder: Relationship to motor control and 2:4 digit ratio. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 36(2), 225-37. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0052-3

Galaburda, A., Loturco, J., Ramus, F., Fitch, R. & Rosen, G. (2006). From genes to behavior in developmental dyslexia. Nature neuroscience, 9(10), 1213-7. doi:10.1038/nn1772

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 204-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Ramus, F. (2007). Papers not in the right section? Science (New York, N.Y.), 317(5837), 453. doi:10.1126/science.317.5837.453a

Peperkamp, S. (2007). Do we have innate knowledge about phonological markedness? Comments on Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin. Cognition, 104(3), 631-7; discussion 638-43. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.009

Millotte, S., Wales, R. & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 898-909. doi:10.1080/01690960701205286

Friederici, A., Friedrich, M. & Christophe, A. (2007). Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current biology : CB, 17(14), 1208-11. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.011

Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. (2007). Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development, 3, 325-341

White, K., Peperkamp, S., Kirk, C. & Morgan, J. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition, 107(1), 238-65. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.012

Sigman, M., Sackur, J., Del Cul, A. & Dehaene, S. (2008). Illusory displacement due to object substitution near the consciousness threshold. Journal of vision, 8(1), 13.1-10. doi:10.1167/8.1.13

Seidl, A. & Cristia, A. (2008). Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. Developmental science, 11(4), 596-606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00704.x

Sackur, J., Naccache, L., Pradat-Diehl, P., Azouvi, P., Mazevet, D., Katz, R., Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (2008). Semantic processing of neglected numbers. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 44(6), 673-82. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.02.003

Ramus, F. & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 61(1), 129-41. doi:10.1080/17470210701508822

Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I. & Nakamura, K. (2008). On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese. Phonology, 25(1), 129-164. doi:10.1017/s0952675708001425

Millotte, S., René, A., Wales, R. & Christophe, A. (2008). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 34(4), 874-85. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.874

Järvinen-Pasley, A., Wallace, G., Ramus, F., Happé, F. & Heaton, P. (2008). Enhanced perceptual processing of speech in autism. Developmental science, 11(1), 109-21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00644.x

Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress 'deafness': the case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682-706. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001

Corallo, G., Sackur, J., Dehaene, S. & Sigman, M. (2008). Limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck. Psychological science, 19(11), 1110-7. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02211.x

Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S. & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and speech, 51(Pt 1-2), 61-75. doi:10.1177/00238309080510010501