Publications

Thouzeau, V., Bollée, J. , Cristia, A. & Chevallier, C. (2023). Decades of Trivers-Willard research on humans: What conclusions can be drawn? Evolution and Human Behavior, 44(4). doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.03.005

Babineau, M. & Christophe, A. (2022). Preverbal infants' sensitivity to grammatical dependencies. . doi:10.1111/infa.12466

Buccola, B., Križ, M. & Chemla, E. (2022). Conceptual Alternatives: Competition in Language and Beyond. Linguistics and Philosophy, 45(2 ), 265–291. doi:10.1007/s10988-021-09327-w

Cristia, A. (2022). A systematic review suggests marked differences in the prevalence of infant-directed vocalization across groups of populations. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.13265

Cychosz, M. & Cristia, A. (2022). Using big data from long-form recordings to study development and optimize societal impact. Advances in child development and behavior, 62, 1-36. doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2021.12.001

Dautriche, I., Buccola, B., Berthet, M., Fagot, J. & Chemla, E. (2022). Evidence for compositionality in baboons (Papio papio) through the test case of negation. Scientific reports, 12(1), 19181. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21143-1

Gautheron, L., Rochat, N. & Cristia, A. (2022). Managing, storing, and sharing long-form recordings and their annotations. Lang Resources & Evaluation. doi:10.1007/s10579-022-09579-3

Kabdebon, C., FLO, A., de Heering, A. & Aslin, R. (2022). The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development. NeuroImage, 254(119150). doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119150

Loukatou, G., Stoll, S., Blasi, D. & Cristia, A. (2022). Does morphological complexity affect word segmentation? Evidence from computational modeling. Cognition, 220, 104960. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104960

Ludusan, B., Cristia, A., Mazuka, R. & Dupoux, E. (2022). How much does prosody help word segmentation? A simulation study on infant-directed speech. Cognition, 219(104961). doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104961

Martin, A., Van Heugten, M., Kager, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2022). Marginal contrast in loanword phonology: Production and perception. Laboratory Phonology, 13(1). doi:10.16995/labphon.6454

Scaff, C., Fibla, L. & Cristia, A. (2022). Factors structuring lexical development in toddlers: The effects of parental education, language exposure, and age. . Journal of Child Language, 1-2. doi:10.1017/S0305000922000186

Schlenker, P., Coye, C. , Steinert{-}threlkeld, S., Klinedinst, N. & Chemla, E. (2022). Beyond Anthropocentrism in Comparative Cognition: Recentering Animal Linguistics. Cognitive Science, 46(12), e13220 . doi:10.1111/cogs.13220

XIAO, H., Strickland, B. & Peperkamp, S. (2022). How fair is gender-fair language? Insights from gender ratio estimations in French. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, . doi:10.1177/0261927X221084643

Babineau, M., Legrand, C. & Shi, R. (2021). Variable forms in French-learning toddlers' lexical representations. . doi:10.1037/dev0001157

Balsa, A. , López Boo, F. , Bloomfield, J. , Cristia, A., Cid, A. , de la Paz Ferro, M. , Valdés, R. & del Luján González, M. (2021). Effect of Crianza Positiva e-messaging program on adult–child language interactions. Behavioural Public Policy, 1-37. doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.25

Buccola, B. & Chemla, E. (2021). Conceptual alternatives. Linguist and Philos . doi:10.1007/s10988-021-09327-w

Carbajal, J., Peperkamp, S. & Tsuji, S. (2021). A meta-analysis of infants’ word-form recognition. Infancy, 26, 369-387. doi:10.1111/infa.12391

Chemla, E. & Egré, P. (2021). From many-valued consequence to many-valued connectives. Synthese, 198, 5315-5352. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02344-0

de Carvalho, A., He, A., Lidz, J. & Christophe, A. (2021). Prosody and Function Words Cue the Acquisition of Word Meanings in 18-Month-Old Infants. Psychological science, 30, 319-332. doi:10.1177/0956797618814131

de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Fiévet, A. & Christophe, A. (2021). Toddlers exploit referential and syntactic cues to flexibly adapt their interpretation of novel verb meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203(105017). doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105017

de Carvalho, A., Crimon, C., Barrault, A. , Trueswell, J. & Christophe, A. (2021). “Look! It is not a bamoule!” 18‐ and 24‐month‐olds can use negative sentences to constrain their interpretation of novel word meanings. Developmental Science, 24(1), e13085. doi:10.1111/desc.13085

Denic, M., Homer, V., Rothschild, D. & Chemla, E. (2021). The influence of polarity items on inferential judgments. Cognition, 215, 104791. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104791

Enguehard, É. & Chemla, E. (2021). Connectedness as a Constraint on Exhaustification . Linguistics and Philosophy, 44(1), 79–112. doi:10.1007/s10988-019-09286-3

Farabolini, G. , Rinaldi, P. , Caselli, M. & Cristia, A. (2021). Non-word repetition in bilingual children: the role of language exposure, vocabulary scores and environmental factors. . Speech, Language and Hearing, 1(16). doi:10.1080/2050571X.2021.1879609

Havron, N., Babineau, M. & Christophe, A. (2021). 18-month-olds fail to use recent experience to infer the syntactic category of novel words. Developmental Science, 24 (2), e1330. doi:10.1111/desc.13030

Havron, N., Scaff, C., Carbajal, J., Linzen, T., Barrault, A. & Christophe, A. (2021). Priming syntactic ambiguity resolution in children and adults. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 1445, 1445-1455. doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1797130

Kolberg, L. , de Carvalho, A., Babineau, M., Havron, N., Fiévet, A., Abaurre, B. & Christophe, A. (2021). "The tiger is hitting! the duck too!" 3-year-olds can use prosodic information to constrain their interpretation of ellipsis. Cognition, 104626. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104626

Melnik, G. & Peperkamp, S. (2021). High-Variability Phonetic Training enhances second language lexical processing: evidence from online training of French learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24, 497-506. doi:10.1017/S1366728920000644

Melnik, G. , Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2021). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French /u/–/y/ contrast. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/0267658320988061